“Investment Policy Pitfalls - Yahoo Finance” plus 3 more |
- Investment Policy Pitfalls - Yahoo Finance
- Avoid Disaster: The Merits of Hindsight in Advance - Huffingtonpost.com
- Videre Design™ LLC Introduces the ERA-XTD: A New ... - PR Inside
- Warsaw ghetto hero Edelman dies - Examiner
| Investment Policy Pitfalls - Yahoo Finance Posted: 07 Jun 2010 01:14 PM PDT Message from Five Filters: If you can, please donate to the full-text RSS service so we can continue developing it. It has always been a standard practice to have a robust investment policy statement (IPS) for institutional investors, but what's interesting is that this practice has become more common among individual investors. In fact, it has become a requirement for investment firms to have this statement drafted and agreed upon by the investment manager and his or her clients. This is also one of the first documents the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) will sample during an audit. This is not a bad thing: A good policy not only keeps the overall investment plan well grounded, but it also provides a road map to develop specific asset allocation strategies and detailed investment guidelines. Here we take a look at this document, and show you some of the common pitfalls investors fall into. Do It Yourself While it's tempting to grab any off-the-shelf policy, there are some common pitfalls with this method that are avoidable if you know how to spot them. The importance of an investment policy tailored to your personal characteristics has become even more apparent during the multiple market gyrations over the last 10 years. In fact, the investment policy statement is now considered to be the main step in using a sound investment philosophy to set detailed investment guidelines. Elements of a Good IPS
Never Enough Time Eyes on the Prize Let's Talk About You Follow Through Since the IPS is an extension of the investor's philosophy and leads directly into his or her specific investment strategies, there is room to adjust. Just remember to make the adjustments early on to create a plan you can stick to as soon as possible. It is generally against the law for investment firms to stray from their previously agreed upon IPSs. Also, switching strategies too often will not only make it impossible to give your strategy a fair test, but it will also incur fees because you will have to alter your portfolio to match your strategy. However, it is always OK to take a step back, make adjustments and have both parties agree on the changes. Use Plain English Language that is too broad can lead to trouble down the road, especially during volatile market times when investors are tempted to make short-term decisions not clearly defined by their IPSs. It is also important not to overwrite the IPS – something investment managers may do to cover all their risk areas. The problem with a very long IPS is that the meaning can get lost in the language and it can be open to legal interpretations in the case of investment losses or errors. It's a good rule of thumb to keep it simple, use bullet points where the details need to be highlighted and make certain that the document is reviewed at least annually to make sure it still applies. How Long Should It Be? Bottom Line Five Filters featured article: Into the Abyss. Available tools: PDF Newspaper, Full Text RSS, Term Extraction. |
| Avoid Disaster: The Merits of Hindsight in Advance - Huffingtonpost.com Posted: 07 Jun 2010 02:54 PM PDT Message from Five Filters: If you can, please donate to the full-text RSS service so we can continue developing it. In a June 2 interview with the Financial Times, BP Chief Executive Tony Hayward openly admitted BP was not prepared for the kind of disaster that has been unleashed on the Gulf. In classically understated form, he said, "What is undoubtedly true is that we did not have the tools you would want in your tool-kit." While the American public expresses their entirely justified, though impotent, rage with BP for causing this horrific tragedy, virtually everyone is asking BP the same question: How can you have no disaster plans in place in the event something like this goes wrong? BP spokespeople assertively state in television interviews that "we had backups," "we had checks in the system," "we followed the established procedures that have allowed these drill sites to operate safely for years." Such misdirected answers only serve to further enrage us because they essentially say, "This should have worked," rather than fully acknowledging it didn't and that the consequences will cost America, indeed the world, dearly for generations to come. What we're seeing with BP is a gigantic manifestation of a common pattern I see routinely in human behavior that, in my opinion, people just don't recognize nearly enough. It's a pattern that occurs in corporations and governments, and exists at the level of individual lives as well. Consider these varied examples:
I can go on giving endless examples of the same destructive pattern. The pattern I'm referring to, if you haven't yet figured it out, is the focus on now to the exclusion of realistically considering what may come later. It's acting without thinking ahead, doing without regard for possible consequences. What might happen later, for most people, is so far removed as to be invisible and irrelevant. Why? Is it human nature to want what we want without the foresight to realize that what we want can harm us (or somebody else)? Is it simply sloppy thinking that can be retrained to help people better anticipate and extrapolate from current conditions? As a clinical psychologist, I am routinely dealing with people's life problems. There are many different ways to categorize people's problems, of course, but one way is to distinguish those problems that we had no part in creating from those that we caused ourselves through our lack of foresight. Most of the problems I treat are in the latter category, and I'd be willing to bet that most clinicians would say the same thing. People do things without foresight and then pay the price later in symptoms and misery that just a little bit of forethought would have prevented. The "philosophy of now" is currently very popular. No surprise, because it emphasizes that "the past is gone, the future hasn't happened yet, so this moment is all there is." It's an unintended consequence and the product of misinterpretation, but too many people absorb the wrong message by taking to heart the idea that the future can't be predicted. They absorb the philosophy that "life is what happens to you when you have other plans" and use it as an excuse to "live for the moment." The "philosophy of now" discourages planning, discourages detailed consideration of possible consequences for the actions of now, and makes it possible to delay dealing with whatever seems easier to avoid right now. Avoidance of the unpleasant is a poor problem-solving strategy. It's not pleasant to consider what happens if the regulator fails at 5,000 feet below the surface, but it's essential if you want to prevent an environmental disaster of global proportions. It's also essential if you want to resolve tough issues such as global warming, immigration, and just about every other problem you can name. For the people who suggest we go "back to the old days and old ways," sorry, but that ship has already sailed. New conditions that human beings have never faced before can't be resolved by old strategies. For those who think you can't be too conservative, and liberal is a dirty word, the rules of conservativism can too easily demand conformity to principles of unfettered freedom that cater to companies like BP, willing to sacrifice others in their pursuit of selfish interests. The view that freedom matters more than responsibility no longer works well in a world where an oil "spill" (a weak little word for a disaster of such huge proportions) or an unregulated industry can unleash a level of damage that can doom us all. For the people who believe you can "drill, baby drill" without ever paying a massive price when human error is inevitable, you should know that anything that has the potential to devastate both people and the planet that relies on human foresight is simply a foolish risk. (Oh, did I mention the radioactive waste water found leaking at the nuclear plant last week?) The future can't be predicted? Actually, that's not true. Aspects of the future can't be predicted, but a lot of the future can. If you smoke, I can predict your health years from now. If you cheat on your spouse, I can predict what will happen when you get caught. When you abuse your child, I can predict what his or her future will look like. How can we encourage foresight in people when we only teach them the philosophy of now? The first step is teaching this most basic principle: It's possible to have hindsight in advance. Five Filters featured article: Into the Abyss. Available tools: PDF Newspaper, Full Text RSS, Term Extraction. |
| Videre Design™ LLC Introduces the ERA-XTD: A New ... - PR Inside Posted: 07 Jun 2010 03:01 PM PDT Message from Five Filters: If you can, please donate to the full-text RSS service so we can continue developing it. 2010-06-08 00:02:28 - A Low-Cost, Powerful, and Ready-To-Run Platform That Speeds Application Development
Menlo Park, CA - For Immediate Release – Videre Design LLC, manufacturer of stereo vision cameras and the powerful Erratic™ family of mobile robots, announces the availability of the ERA-XTD robot platform. The ERA-XTD offers a fully loaded mobile robot with a complete set of sensors, a stereo vision camera, an integrated PC, and advanced open-source software. With ERA-XTD, researchers and commercial developers have everything they need to begin their robotics development."Through the use of off-the-shelf, high quality components, Videre Design is able to offer compact, affordable and powerful mobile robot platforms said Janet McLaughlin, CEO of Videre Design. "The ERA-XTD is an all-purpose robotic platform that saves researchers and developers time and resources, and provides them with a solid test environment for their applications
The Potential of Robotics and Videre Design's Philosophy Videre Design employs a design philosophy that incorporates a set of qualities based on the vision of Dr. Kurt Konolige, designer of the Erratic family of robotic platforms. Founded on the fundamental tenets of simplicity, power and affordability, the Erratics use readily available, high quality components. Further, the Erratics use the open-source Player/Stage software system. The result is a compact, powerful and versatile robotics platform that jumpstarts robot application development, making it easier for researchers and developers to prototype and build proof of concept robots.
The ERA-XTD: Robust and Ready-to-Use The addition of the ERA-XTD creates a complete line of mobile robots tailored to meet a range of customer needs: The ERA-BASE is designed for those with their own computer. The ERA-MOBI includes a PC, and lets users pick-and-choose the sensors best suited for their application. Finally, the ERA-XTD is available for those looking for a complete system, pre-configured for immediate use. "With these industrial-focused components, the ERA-XTD meets a pressing market need for a low-power, small-footprint, sturdy, high-performance and highly intelligent robot platform stated Janet McLaughlin. "We are pleased to provide a true, out-of-the box experience and to continue to extend the line of Erratics
Pricing and Availability
### Videre Design is the only single-source manufacturer that marries stereo imaging systems and robotics – built for strength and ease of use. At the heart of our products is our advanced, intelligent software that offers more control over calibrating, capturing, processing and displaying images. Whether our cameras and robots are purchased individually or altogether, we offer a complete package, all available for immediate use. Our products have been used in over 40 countries in a myriad of applications from the world's largest book digitizing project to university-level robotics classes and RoboCup Competitions. Founded in 1998, Videre Design LLC is headquartered in Menlo Park, CA, USA, and has an extensive international client base including BMW, Caja Granada Museum, Deere & Company, IBM, MIT, NASA, NOAA Fisheries, Siemens, Toyota, the US Defense Department and most universities that study vision and robotics.
Contact: Five Filters featured article: Into the Abyss. Available tools: PDF Newspaper, Full Text RSS, Term Extraction. |
| Warsaw ghetto hero Edelman dies - Examiner Posted: 07 Jun 2010 02:32 PM PDT Message from Five Filters: If you can, please donate to the full-text RSS service so we can continue developing it. A man who knew first-hand about the ultimate need for an armed citizenry has died. From the Associated Press:
Here's the underlying truth of Mr. Edelman's life's philosophy--one that we'll fail to understand at our peril:
Compare this to some "leaders" in U.S. Jewish communities who preach citizen disarmament. As George Santayana wrote:
The only way "never again" works is if you mean it. *Photo information from AP: "In this April 19, 2007 file photo, Marek Edelman stands in front of the Warsaw Ghetto Heroes monument during ceremonies marking the 64th anniversary of the uprising, in Warsaw, Poland. Marek Edelman, the last surviving leader of WWII Warsaw Ghetto uprising, died Friday, Oct. 2, 2009 in Warsaw at the age of 90." Additional Resources: "The Warsaw Ghetto Uprising" by Marek Edelman United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: "Warsaw Ghetto Uprising"
Five Filters featured article: Into the Abyss. Available tools: PDF Newspaper, Full Text RSS, Term Extraction. |
| You are subscribed to email updates from Philosophy - Bing News To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
| Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 | |


0 comments:
Post a Comment