“Analyst Bove flogs BofA with Philosophy 101 - Crain's New York Business” plus 3 more |
- Analyst Bove flogs BofA with Philosophy 101 - Crain's New York Business
- Philosophy and fear: the wisdom of Renzo Gracie - Yahoo! Sports - Top News
- Who Was Jacques Derrida? An Intellectual Biography, By ... - The Independent
- ACLJ: Justice Stevens' Replacement to "Impact ... - PR Inside
| Analyst Bove flogs BofA with Philosophy 101 - Crain's New York Business Posted: 09 Apr 2010 12:01 PM PDT Renowned banking analyst Dick Bove is calling on Bank of America to break itself up. In a Friday report, he dutifully backed up this idea with the sorts of numbers Wall Street types often use to show the bank's different components are worth more separate than together. Much more interestingly, he also cited BofA's failure in living up to the teachings of 19th century German philosopher Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel. Mr. Hegel is best known for his work on dialectics, which says that an event, for instance the Protestant Reformation, triggers an forceful opposing event (the Counter-Reformation), and eventually the phenomena combine, or synthesize, to produce an improved state of being. (In fact, Catholic and Protestant Europe did learn to live together, more or less agreeably). By the way, this school of thought was an important foundation for Karl Marx. Mr. Bove, a Rochdale Securities analyst who clearly has read up on Idealist philosophers, says that BofA fails to meet the Hegelian test. "In a Hegelian cycle, events keep returning to the same place. However, that position is always higher and somewhat better than in the prior cycle due to the accumulated wisdom gained from prior cycles," he wrote. "However, [BofA] shows no evidence of having learned anything from the past cycles….It gets back to the same position but at a lower point in the cycle." Although he didn't cite Nietzsche's concept of the eternal recurrence, Mr. Bove may well have had that in mind when pointed out that last year BofA's stock was trading for the same price it fetched in 1982 and its dividend payout appears to be the same. In a best of all possible worlds—a phrase coined by 18th century philosopher Gottfried Leibniz—Mr. Bove argues that BofA's different businesses would be spun off as independent entities. These newly independent companies, surely stocked with the sort of Ubermenschen in management that Friedrich Nietzsche would appreciate, would lead shareholders to greater heights than BofA could. Mr. Bove pegged BofA's break-up value at $53 a share. An analyst for some 40 years, Mr. Bove is known for his forthright views that distinguish him from many other analysts, though sometimes his work resembles Jean-Jacques Rousseau's Reveries of a Solitary Walker. A BofA spokesman had no comment. Five Filters featured article: Chilcot Inquiry. Available tools: PDF Newspaper, Full Text RSS, Term Extraction. |
| Philosophy and fear: the wisdom of Renzo Gracie - Yahoo! Sports - Top News Posted: 09 Apr 2010 09:02 AM PDT
"I believe in myself over everyone else. There's nothing that walks on two legs that I'm afraid of." — Countdown to UFC 112. "When you win, it's easy to forget all the hardship that you went through to get the win. You get so excited with the victory and the people around you congratulating you and hugging you, you completely forget all the mistakes you made in that fight. But when you lose, you know them, and you will never forget them." — Interview with UFC.com "There's more philosophy in jiu-jitsu mats than in any Ivy League school in America." — Twitter "The easiest thing to sell in life is jiu-jitsu and UFC." — Fanhouse interview Not only does he come out with those great nuggets, he likes to share quotes from other people. This quote from German writer Johann Wolfgang Von Goethe seems particularly appropriate:
This bout with Hughes gives Gracie a moment like few others. We'll see tomorrow if he can seize it. Five Filters featured article: Chilcot Inquiry. Available tools: PDF Newspaper, Full Text RSS, Term Extraction. |
| Who Was Jacques Derrida? An Intellectual Biography, By ... - The Independent Posted: 09 Apr 2010 01:19 PM PDT
Since his death in 2004, it's fair to say that the reputation of Jacques Derrida has been in a slow but steady decline. This much has been to the delight of his critics (mainly British or American), who during his lifetime regarded him as a fraud and a charlatan or, worse still, a kind of guru figure whose only creed was a relentless carping nihilism. By the same token, Derrida's critics will argue that there is also something slightly dated and faded about "deconstructionism", the philosophical school Derrida allegedly founded. The accepted wisdom is that these days this pseudo-philosophy persists only in modish new universities where professors of media or cultural studies have run out things to say about Marxism. The long-standing antagonism to Derrida in the English-speaking world came to a head with the so-called "Cambridge Affair" of 1992. This controversy was triggered by the decision of University of Cambridge to award Derrida an honorary doctorate. This was fiercely opposed by conservative philosophers in Cambridge and across the world. An open letter was even published in The Times, signed by 19 leading philosophers, denouncing Derrida for his "tricks and gimmicks" and having reduced "contemporary French philosophy to an object of ridicule". Derrida was awarded his doctorate. But despite his show of public indifference, he was wounded by this attack. For all his wayward tactics, as David Mikics explains with great care and lucidity in this admirable book, Derrida was a committed, serious thinker whose main ambition was to make philosophy important outside the philosophy departments of universities. More to the point, Mikics insists that "deconstructionism" (a word Derrida scorned) is not really a philosophical position at all but rather a technique: it is a way of decoding the surface of reality in order to better reshape it. Derrida himself regarded his critical ways of reading as intensely political. Little wonder then in his later years that he returned to Marx. Derrida's last great book is indeed a series of essays called Specters of Marx, written in 1994 partly as a response to the collapse of Communism but also "to rescue Marx" from the wreckage of history. Derrida reads Marx not as a prophet but as a critic of ideas. For Derrida, this is not nostalgia but a way of preserving Marx. In the contemporary world of rogue states, phony democracies, the tyranny of technology and the collapsing financial systems, Marx emerges for Derrida as an "ideal" of justice and liberty. Mikics is unconvinced by this and describes Derrida here as "doom-mongering". In fact reading Specters of Marx now is bracing and salutary - not words usually associated with Derrida. However, the great merit of this intellectual biography is that it not only arrests the downward motion of Derrida's influence but restores him to his proper place. This is as part of a long tradition in Continental Philosophy which connects an ironic scepticism with a profound sense of inquiry. Derrida's peers, the argument follows, are not only Barthes, Deleuze, Foucault, but also Nietzsche, Rousseau or even Plato - all philosophers of what it means to be human as defined through language. Mikics is a literary critic by training and able to explain with forensic detail even the most apparently obscure thoughts of Derrida. The notion of "différance" - which is in my experience a notorious stumbling-block for even the sharpest of undergraduate minds - is explained briskly as the gap between what a person speaks or writes and how that discourse is understood by its audience. The emphasis is on the gap and not the reception (which is irrelevant). Once this point is grasped, great chunks of Derrida's writing suddenly become both comprehensible and stimulating. Derrida himself argued vehemently that biography was the enemy of truth. His most famous maxim, known even by those who have never read him, is "il n'y a pas de hors texte" ("there is nothing beyond the text"), meaning that an author's words have no relation to an author's life. This is the kind of statement that has always so outraged Anglo-Saxon empiricists. Mikics takes this statement head-on as a challenge and charges straight into Derrida's education and background in Algeria. Derrida came from a family of Sephardic Jews and was always ill-at-ease with his position as French citizen born into a Muslim country. Hitler's rise to power was celebrated by anti-Semitic mobs in Algiers and Constantine. During the Second World War, the Vichy government persecuted Jews in Algeria as in France with a viciousness that sometimes shocked the Nazis. His experiences as a child left him with the knowledge he was an outsider to French culture even though French was his native tongue. For Mikics, this is the key to understanding Derrida - as a rebel against all orthodoxies of language or thought. This does not make him a hero. Indeed, Mikics makes the point in his conclusion that Derrida was often wrong, sometimes confused, and satirised his own reputation as a guru. But as this book winningly reveals, Derrida was - as they say in French – "un homme sérieux" after all. Andrew Hussey is dean of the University of London Institute in Paris '); } else { document.write('Five Filters featured article: Chilcot Inquiry. Available tools: PDF Newspaper, Full Text RSS, Term Extraction. |
| ACLJ: Justice Stevens' Replacement to "Impact ... - PR Inside Posted: 09 Apr 2010 09:52 AM PDT 2010-04-09 18:57:02 -
The American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ), focusing on constitutional law, said today the reported retirement of Justice John Paul Stevens from the Supreme Court sets the stage for President Obama to name a replacement who will play a pivotal role in reshaping the federal judiciary. "The announcement of Justice Stevens' retirement underscores the reality that President Obama will make a second appointment to the nation's highest court that will impact generations to come," said Jay Sekulow, Chief Counsel of the ACLJ."While there's certain to be much debate about Justice Stevens' replacement, there is one thing that is clear - President Obama is likely to name a nominee who will embrace an extremely liberal judicial philosophy. Make no mistake about it - this appointment really represents more than just replacing one vote on the court. With a replacement who is likely to serve for 30 or 40 years, it's clear this replacement will have a long-term impact on judicial philosophy and likely play a determining factor in decisions for decades to come. "Once a nominee is named and the confirmation process begins, it's important that the nominee face full and detailed hearings – with specific focus on the nominee's judicial philosophy including how the nominee views the Constitution, the role of judges, and the rule of law. That is what the American people expect and deserve." The ACLJ is online at www.aclj.org :
American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ)MEDIA CONTACTS:For Print: Gene Kapp (757) 575-9520orFor Five Filters featured article: Chilcot Inquiry. Available tools: PDF Newspaper, Full Text RSS, Term Extraction. |
| You are subscribed to email updates from Philosophy - Bing News To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
| Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 | |

Renzo Gracie, member of the vaunted Gracie family and Matt Hughes' opponent at UFC 112 on Saturday, is nothing if not outspoken. Between his Twitter, interviews, and the fight club Q and A that we've written about in the past few days, Gracie isn't shy about sharing pearls of wisdom. 
0 comments:
Post a Comment